Posts

Showing posts from May, 2015

What So New in vSphere 6?

With the announcement and also from the datasheet , it seems to be pretty lots of functionalities been added.  However there are some critical ones that are more appealing and wanting to see approvement or resolution to those who are already using since vSphere 4 and prior till today which are not make known to many. Storage There were many discussion over storage UNMAP via thin provisioning and many called it a "myth".  This was also discussed heavily in our Facebook VMUG - ASEAN group.  This was due to many changes since VMFS3 to till VMFS5.  Cody wrote a long history of what are the changes for those who have missed out here . A KB was also release and this create some discussion VMFS3 with different block size would benefit thin provision so to speak before vSphere 5.0 Update 1.  Sadly after which, all UNMAP was not possible via GUI or automatically other than via command line or script. I try to ask internally as well and luckily Cormac with his findings has li

vNUMA Improvement in vSphere 6

Image
NUMA is always a very interesting topic when in design and operation in virtualization space.  We need to understand it so we can size a proper VM more effectively and efficiently for application to perform at its optimum. To understand what is NUMA and how it works, a very good article to read will be from here .  Mathias has explained this in a very simple terms with good pictures that I do not have to reinvent.  How I wish I have this article back then. Starting from ESX 3.5, NUMA was made aware to ESX servers.  Allowing for memory locality via a NUMA node concept.  This helps address memory locality performance. In vSphere 4.1, wide-VM was introduce this was due to VM been allocating more vCPUs than the physical cores per CPU (larger than a NUMA node).  Check out Frank's post . In vSphere 5.0, vNUMA was introduced to improve the performance of the CPU scheduling having VM to be exposed to the physical NUMA architecture.  Understanding how this works help to understan

Applications for Storage or Storage for Applications?

With many new start ups from storage arrays, converged, hyper-converged to software defined storage (SDS), many users starts to have lots of choice to make. Recently encountering many questions on which should they choose and which is better.  However there is no straight answer as there are just too many choices to choose from just like in a supermarket.  In the end, some may choose one that advertise the best and create the best reminder in your mind.  To be truth, you will not buy and replaced the rest, but rather some have a hybrid environment for some reasons which we will go through later. With several asks and questions, I like to give some guideline when deciding.  Here I will do my best to start with no bias towards any technology and this is my personal opinion and may not be the same with others. 1.  Ease of management: A big word often misused by marketing I would say.  Assess it and ask yourself do you have a team to manage different components and if you have a lean